From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc7CG-0005Jj-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:19:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc7CF-0005I4-6P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:19:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc7CE-0005Hp-Sm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:18:58 -0400 Received: from [199.45.160.85] (helo=harmony.bsdimp.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Gc7CE-0008Sl-E3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:18:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:17:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20061023.151707.1544555408.imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] config file support From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200610231639.00717.rob@landley.net> References: <200610221751.50317.rob@landley.net> <453D00CD.6010307@palmsource.com> <200610231639.00717.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rob@landley.net In message: <200610231639.00717.rob@landley.net> Rob Landley writes: : > Seems to me they both address roughly the same : > issues with roughly the same considerations. : : Using a *.PIF file is the Windows way. Using the command line is Linux. Except for complicated things, like, say, X's config file. Warner