From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GcVrq-0001LR-MW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:39:34 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GcVrp-0001Ji-K8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:39:33 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcVrp-0001JC-8a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:39:33 -0400
Received: from [71.162.243.5] (helo=grelber.thyrsus.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GcVrp-0005Tn-A2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:39:33 -0400
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:39:06 -0400
References: <45391B22.1050608@palmsource.com> <453D0428.9090809@palmsource.com>
	<200610231937.44676.paul@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200610231937.44676.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200610241939.06772.rob@landley.net>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Monday 23 October 2006 2:37 pm, Paul Brook wrote:
> It turn out that qemu already does most of the hard work, and a code 
> generation backend is fairly simple. The diff for my current implementation 
> is <2k lines of common code, plus <1k lines for each of x86, amd64 and ppc32 
> hosts.

My understanding is that the version you linked to with your new backend 
currently _only_ supports coldfire/m68k?

Do you have a quick "here's you how try it out" thing?  (For example, when I 
first show people qemu I boot a knoppix cd image under it.  Fast and 
shiny. :)

Rob
-- 
"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery