From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GegKP-0002ns-3s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:14:01 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GegKK-0002gM-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:14:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GegKK-0002g8-4c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:13:56 -0500 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GegKJ-0006en-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:13:56 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:13:51 +0000 References: <45391B22.1050608@palmsource.com> <200610301650.46686.paul@codesourcery.com> <1162248896.11548.5.camel@base.torri.org> In-Reply-To: <1162248896.11548.5.camel@base.torri.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610302313.52520.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday 30 October 2006 22:54, Stephen Torri wrote: > > As I said before, the x86 target is a hybrid of the new and old code. ie. > > if it didn't work before it probably won't work after. configure > > with --target-list=m68k-user and it should work fine with gcc4. > > > > Paul > > I need a x86 instruction set simulator that can step-by-step execute > could and allow me access to the internals. This is why I have looked at > qemu because of a recommendation from a developer of Ptlsim. It was > suggested that qemu would be lighter weight for what I need. So what do > you suggest I use for a x86 instruction set simulator? Use qemu, and build it with gcc3. Paul