From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJhS-0004Eo-0C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:16:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJhQ-0004Dr-Vu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:16:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJhQ-0004DS-O7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:16:24 -0500 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GfJhQ-0002CD-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:16:24 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: Fwd: [Qemu-devel] Interrupt request info Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:16:20 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611011716.21463.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > I already read this, but give no usefull information... and I searched > everywhere in the web... > For example, I wrote a module of a simple memory without implementing > IRQ... I think it is an error but it works fine... are IRQ raise in any > case??? I look at other code source of implemented hw but for each device > there is a differeny way to raise an interrupt (i see). > Is there a standard way to do this? pic_set_irq_new Paul