From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GjNaI-0000Dz-5D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:13:50 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GjNaG-0000Dn-IL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:13:49 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjNaG-0000Dk-8X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:13:48 -0500
Received: from [66.93.172.17] (helo=nevyn.them.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(Exim 4.52) id 1GjNaG-00013I-41
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:13:48 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1GjNaE-0006fg-Ux
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:13:47 -0500
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 17:13:46 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Huge TLB performance improvement
Message-ID: <20061112221346.GA25593@nevyn.them.org>
References: <20060306145929.GD27785@networkno.de>
	<20061112011035.GB21771@nevyn.them.org>
	<45570A32.3030608@wanadoo.fr>
	<200611121408.09895.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20061112142938.GC4040@networkno.de>
	<20061112165635.GA13998@nevyn.them.org>
	<455761CF.4080302@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <455761CF.4080302@gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 07:02:55PM +0100, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >This is with all of the patches I've posted to the
> >list applied
> 
> If patches settle down would be nice to get a list of 
> patches or a summary patch to be applied in which order 
> against which basis. Seems that I mixed up finding the 
> correct ones in the correct order ;)

I'll do that, though not until Paul is finished applying whichever ones
he has time for :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery