From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GmTil-000264-Qw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:23:23 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GmTij-00024e-F1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:23:22 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmTij-00024b-5l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:23:21 -0500
Received: from [66.249.82.231] (helo=wx-out-0506.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GmTij-0003pX-4q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:23:21 -0500
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so3218285wxd
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:23:20 -0800 (PST)
From: David Roberts <dvdr18@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Base images
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:23:15 +1000
References: <200611212058.52686.dvdr18@gmail.com> <4562E05F.3050601@nl.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4562E05F.3050601@nl.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200611212123.15135.dvdr18@gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> Would be nice if a command like:
> =A0 "qemu-img relocate <filename> -p <path_to_new_base_image>"
> would be added.
Yes, thats the kind of thing I was hoping for.

> I have been able sometimes to hack new path names into the header of
> the qemu image-file but that is not an ideal solution, and it is not
> always possible.
Does sed work, or will it just corrupt the image?

=2D-=20
David Roberts :)
http://kavenc.sf.net/