From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwVM6-0003ZG-L5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:09:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GwVM4-0003VV-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:09:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwVM3-0003Up-Li for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:09:23 -0500 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GwVM3-0003A3-2M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:09:23 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Improve gcc 3 checking Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:09:19 +0000 References: <45874D81.1090508@cs.utexas.edu> <200612190231.08331.paul@codesourcery.com> <45875558.7020501@cs.utexas.edu> In-Reply-To: <45875558.7020501@cs.utexas.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612190309.20174.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > If they explicitly specific an invalid --cc=, the checks will get > triggered (but in the past, we would have bailed). That's what I'm objecting to. If I do: ./configure --cc=gcc4 I expect configure to either use gcc4 or fail with an error. Preferably the latter, but I'm open to persuasion. I don't want configure to decide it knows better and use gcc3 anyway. Paul