From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Sew-0007kc-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:05:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Sew-0007kM-0E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:05:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Sev-0007kJ-Re for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:05:13 -0500 Received: from [71.162.243.5] (helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H0Sev-0007h3-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:05:13 -0500 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC32 Trace Exception and Trap instruction Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:05:04 -0500 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612292005.05795.rob@landley.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Ely Soto On Wednesday 27 December 2006 11:24 am, Ely Soto wrote: > Excellent, I had encountered that bug earlier on when trying to debug > using workbench. > > Are you guys developing a BSP for qemu? > I have a partially working one. I'm poking at something like that. http://landley.net/code/firmware http://landley.net/hg/firmware Of course I'm using a gcc 4.x toolchain, so I'm applying the gentoo patches to qemu 0.8.2 to build under that, and last I checked they weren't enough to get cvs to build under gcc 4.x, but I haven't poked at it recently... Rob -- "Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery