From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2703-0004mw-Fc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:21:51 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H2701-0004lh-Om
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:21:51 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2701-0004lW-HP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:21:49 -0500
Received: from [195.3.96.102] (helo=email.aon.at)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2701-0007Kw-1e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:21:49 -0500
Received: from m965p018.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO s37.loc)
	([62.47.152.146]) (envelope-sender <rep.nop@aon.at>)
	by smarthub75.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; 3 Jan 2007 14:21:46 -0000
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:23:40 +0100
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.nop@aon.at>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Makefile configure
Message-ID: <20070103142339.GE24482@aon.at>
References: <E1H1UkH-00031L-K0@savannah.gnu.org>
	<20070103135950.GB5849@networkno.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070103135950.GB5849@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:59:50PM +0000, Thiemo Seufer wrote:

>All of this works fine for me, but patches of this sort are likely to
>break things, so please test and comment.
>
>
>Thiemo
>

>Index: Makefile.target
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/Makefile.target,v
>retrieving revision 1.134
>diff -u -p -r1.134 Makefile.target
>--- Makefile.target	7 Dec 2006 18:15:35 -0000	1.134
>+++ Makefile.target	3 Jan 2007 13:47:50 -0000
>@@ -91,66 +91,66 @@ endif
> endif
> 
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
>-OP_CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) -falign-functions=0
>-LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-T,$(SRC_PATH)/x86_64.ld
>+LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-T,$(SRC_PATH)/$(ARCH).ld
> endif
> 
> ifeq ($(ARCH),ppc)
-> CFLAGS+= -D__powerpc__
+ CPPFLAGS += -D__powerpc__

(doesn't cpp already define that on ppc?)

>Index: configure
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/configure,v
>retrieving revision 1.115
>diff -u -p -r1.115 configure
>--- configure	1 Jan 2007 21:31:01 -0000	1.115
>+++ configure	3 Jan 2007 13:47:50 -0000
>@@ -243,6 +244,10 @@ for opt do
>   esac
> done
> 
>+# default flags for all hosts
>+CFLAGS=$CFLAGS "-Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing"
>+LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS "-g"

Does that really work for you?
I'd rather say
LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -g"

cheers,