From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H3WQD-0002qI-T0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:42:41 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H3WQC-0002q6-0H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:42:41 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H3WQB-0002q3-St
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:42:39 -0500
Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H3WQB-000407-C8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:42:39 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Problem with high load average when using -nographic
	with qemu in background
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:42:31 +0000
References: <200701061008.09809.phil@supstitches.com>
	<200701062203.18782.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<1168146212.15464.6.camel@quark>
In-Reply-To: <1168146212.15464.6.camel@quark>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200701071142.33309.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, phil@supstitches.com

On Sunday 07 January 2007 05:03, Phil Rasch wrote:
> Now that I know that I didn't completely miss the point, and may even
> have tried a reasonable thing, I have a question and a workaround.
>
> 1) Question: How do other people do this sort of thing? That is, start a
> virtual machine when the hostmachine is booted automatically? Or dont
> they worry about the load/performance issues?

I fixed qemu so it wasn't broken.

Paul