From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HCpbK-00069Y-7f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:00:38 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HCpbI-00065h-7K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:00:37 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCpbH-00065e-W1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:00:36 -0500
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HCpbH-0000AB-HF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:00:35 -0500
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 04:02:00 +0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: strange crash on FreeBSD-current/amd64 (pointer
	truncation?)
Message-ID: <20070202040200.GA32244@networkno.de>
References: <20070124200019.GA36641@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
	<20070201200030.GA68583@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070201200030.GA68583@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:00:19PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> >  I got a report of qemu segfaulting here on FreeBSD-current/amd64:
> > 
> > > #0  main_loop () at /usr/ports-cvs/emulators/qemu/work/qemu-snapshot-2007-01-11_05/vl.c:6125
> > > 6125                    env = env->next_cpu;
> > > [New Thread 0x801e10190 (LWP 100214)]
> > > (gdb) print env
> > > $1 = (CPUX86State *) 0xac10000
> > > (gdb) print first_cpu
> > > $2 = (CPUX86State *) 0x80ac10000
> 
> Ok Jung-uk Kim found the following fix: (Thanx!)
> 
> --- qemu/cpu-exec.c.orig	Wed Jan 31 16:58:03 2007
> +++ qemu/cpu-exec.c	Wed Jan 31 17:08:11 2007
> @@ -226,9 +226,9 @@
>  
>  int cpu_exec(CPUState *env1)
>  {
> -    int saved_T0, saved_T1;
> +    long saved_T0, saved_T1;
>  #if defined(reg_T2)
> -    int saved_T2;
> +    long saved_T2;

I used target_ulong instead.


Thiemo