From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HJKwh-00074S-TN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:41:35 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HJKwg-00074D-RU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:41:35 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJKwg-00074A-Lm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:41:34 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HJKwg-00061L-4R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:41:34 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] FreeBSD Support
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:41:25 +0000
References: <200702161402.23660.cwolsen@domainatlantic.com>
	<200702200146.05003.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<200702192110.52907.cwolsen@domainatlantic.com>
In-Reply-To: <200702192110.52907.cwolsen@domainatlantic.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200702200241.26220.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Christopher Olsen <cwolsen@domainatlantic.com>

> So should I make a separate patch for each modified file?

No. You should break changes into logically independent patches.
It is ok for a single patch to touch multiple files, but it should only fix 
one thing.

Paul