From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HJvzI-0008PY-Ia
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:14:44 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HJvzH-0008Ox-3P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:14:43 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJvzG-0008Ou-UC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:14:42 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HJvzG-0001c9-Fy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:14:42 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SH4 softmmu port still functionnal?
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:14:17 +0000
References: <45DC6746.4090005@sysgo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <45DC6746.4090005@sysgo.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200702211814.18277.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Christophe Conil <cconil@sysgo.fr>

> I saw Paul Brook's answer in the mail archive, that SH4 port is quite
> functional, so am I missing something? Is he talking about the
> user-mode sh4 port?

I was running sh2 binaries with the usermode emulator.
I have never tried sh4 binaries or the system emulation bits.

Paul