From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HK6MQ-00082D-3R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:19:18 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HK6MP-000821-1K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:19:17 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HK6MO-00081y-SY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:19:16 -0500
Received: from cpe-24-31-246-32.kc.res.rr.com ([24.31.246.32]
	helo=tsurukikun.utopios.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HK6MO-0004TD-Ix
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:19:16 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tsurukikun.utopios.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2416CF4108
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:19:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@utopios.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:19:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200702220519.10448.luke-jr@utopios.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: VNC
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Is there a reason to not use the semi-standard -rfbauth <filename> argument?