From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLjPr-0002f9-Sp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:13:35 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLjPp-0002dB-9Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:13:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLjPp-0002d2-6c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:13:33 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HLjPo-0004Q3-O6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:13:33 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] armv6 support Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:13:22 +0000 References: <200702232254.54206.paul@codesourcery.com> <1CBC9B360664C24FA6BCBF2C43D3F5DD0536F9E2@mustang.eu.tieto.com> In-Reply-To: <1CBC9B360664C24FA6BCBF2C43D3F5DD0536F9E2@mustang.eu.tieto.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702261713.23694.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: osantana@gmail.com, rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com, Magnus.Einarsson@tietoenator.com, marcio.macedo@gmail.com > > I already have ARMv6 and ARMv7 implemented, but am unable to > > release the code. > > See: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-03/msg00202.html > > > > We (CodeSourcery) are negotiating with ARM to have this > > restriction lifted, but it's slow going. > > > > If you want to see ARMv6 support in QEMU please contact ARM > > directly and encourage them to sort the legal issues out. > > > Would you be able to share the code with someone that has an appropriate > license with ARM? No. Section 7 of the GPL says that the code must be freely[1] redistributeable or not distributed at all. Even if this were not the case I would be extremely reluctant to do this. It would effectively mean that you would be able to distribute an armv6 qemu but we would not (because you have braver lawers than we do). Paul [1] freely = to any third party under the terms of the GPL.