From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOj4C-0001sA-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:27:36 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOj48-0001qV-Rp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:27:35 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOj48-0001qO-FR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:27:32 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOj46-0003IB-6p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:27:30 -0500 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] armv6 support Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:27:18 -0500 References: <200702232254.54206.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200702232254.54206.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703061827.18316.rob@landley.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook On Friday 23 February 2007 5:54 pm, Paul Brook wrote: > On Friday 23 February 2007 20:09, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is there someone working on armv6 support? > > I'm very interested to help this development... > > I already have ARMv6 and ARMv7 implemented, but am unable to release the > code. On an unrelated note, is there any way to tell qemu to only support a subset, ala i386 or i586, armv4l, disable the math coprocessor, nommu, etc? (Or is it on the todo list anywhere?) There are times I want to build a distro for somebody trying to deploy on a via samuel or some such, and I want a way to test that this will actually run on that hardware and that the darn toolchain/kernel/uClibc didn't leak something more recent into the binary. (I'd love to be able to test uClinux on qemu instead of armulator.) Rob -- Vista: Windows Millenium Second Edition