qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>,
	Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@indt.org.br>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm: wrong execution of post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are the same register
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:10:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703152110.39814.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdb0025f0703151332j36d31aa7i6ee2cea9bfb29a94@mail.gmail.com>

> > This is still wrong.
>
> So, is this a known bug?

Still wrong implies it's a bug, and your patch does not fix it properly.

> > The writeback must happen after the load.
>
> We code like this because
> - we didn't find this restriction in arm reference manual

It's the Abort model section you mention below.

> - the LLVM uses this instruction expecting a result like this

The compiler knows nothing about the abort behavior. The difference is only 
visible if the load faults.

> - That was the result that we got running these instructions in an OMAP1710

I suggest you check again. I'm fairly sure the arm926 implements the Base 
Restored abort model.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-15 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-15 19:35 [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm: wrong execution of post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are the same register Lauro Ramos Venancio
2007-03-15 19:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Lauro Ramos Venancio
2007-03-15 20:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
2007-03-15 20:32   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2007-03-15 21:10     ` Paul Brook [this message]
2007-03-15 21:19       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2007-03-15 21:55       ` Laurent Desnogues
2007-03-15 22:04         ` Paul Brook
2007-03-16 20:42           ` Lauro Ramos Venancio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703152110.39814.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=lauro.venancio@indt.org.br \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).