From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUW6V-0001vv-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:49:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HUW6U-0001vT-68 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:49:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HUW6T-0001v8-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:49:54 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HUW4d-0005mD-Io for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:47:59 -0400 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: This project needs a stable branch Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:47:49 -0400 References: <200703151111.04453.jseward@acm.org> <200703151453.44831.paul@codesourcery.com> <200703202219.46063.jseward@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <200703202219.46063.jseward@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703221847.49715.rob@landley.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paul Brook On Tuesday 20 March 2007 6:19 pm, Julian Seward wrote: > Limited effort is always a problem, granted. > > So here's a broader question, which I'm surprised nobody has asked > before (afaik). Think forward to a hypothetical QEMU 1.0 release. > What criteria are required for such a release? *cough* *cough* QOPS *cough* *cough* Rob -- Vista: Windows Millenium Second Edition