From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWNpA-0002Vq-OM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:23:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWNp8-0002SS-Qz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:23:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWNp8-0002SH-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:23:42 -0500 Received: from return.false.org ([66.207.162.98]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWNmi-0006ar-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:21:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:21:10 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Increase max -kernel size Message-ID: <20070328022110.GA8233@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070327212511.GA25000@caradoc.them.org> <20070327215624.GA16825@networkno.de> <200703272327.03693.paul@codesourcery.com> <20070327233517.GB16825@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070327233517.GB16825@networkno.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: Paul Brook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:35:18AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Right, a piggyback-style loader would likely fail in that case. Which is exactly the interesting case for x86_64. So, since Paul's verified that grub and lilo just put them far apart, maybe bumping up the size is the right thing to do. Or always putting the initrd at the top of emulated RAM. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery