From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWwL3-0001Xx-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:14:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HWwL1-0001WM-Lz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:14:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWwL1-0001WG-DD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:14:55 -0500 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HWwIP-0008Fu-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:12:13 -0400 Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070329151211.HTIX2951.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:12:11 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.21.212]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070329151211.VEHM29112.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:12:11 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.50) id 1HWwIL-0001jH-Di for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:12:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:12:09 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU Alpha target Message-ID: <20070329151209.GA6635@miranda.arrow> References: <20070317143730.1befbf94@neuling> <20070329125554.02174819@neuling> <20070329145544.GA6553@miranda.arrow> <200703291608.26347.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703291608.26347.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 04:08:25PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > > There do seem to be a few people who'd like Alpha emulation for QEMU. > > Obviously, you'd want to get dynamic translation working first. :-) > > > > OTOH, I'm now wondering which archs can support full virtualisation. > > Depends how you define "full virtualization". If you call kqemu full > virtualization then you can do that on pretty much any CPU. I meant "meeting Popek and Goldberg's virtualisation requirements". -- Stuart Brady