From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HYLta-0003ZD-Tc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:44:26 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HYLtZ-0003Yi-If
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:44:26 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HYLtZ-0003Ya-7B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:44:25 -0400
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1HYLqW-0007o3-NY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:41:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:32:57 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] More PCI ethernet emulations
Message-ID: <20070402123257.GD24846@networkno.de>
References: <33328190.1174979798015.JavaMail.root@eastrmwml08.mgt.cox.net>
	<460AD667.8070608@mail.berlios.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <460AD667.8070608@mail.berlios.de>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Stefan Weil wrote:
> Good question. I stumbled about this, too, when I looked
> at the code how I could apply your patch. Some months
> had past since I wrote it :-)
> 
> The code writes to a serial EEPROM, so the 16 bits are
> sent using only a clock and a single data bit. The
> EEPROM emulation then takes the single bits and puts
> them together.
> 
> The function gets a byte which contains clock, data and
> two other significant bits, and 4 bits which are always 0.
> 
> When called with a word, only one byte is needed.
> Maybe it is the wrong one - if you work with different
> endianess.

The card is detected on ppc/Linux emulating mipsel/Linux, but
no interface is configured. It works on x86/Linux emulating
mipsel/Linux.


Thiemo