From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZxgq-0001Cy-Kd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:17:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZxgp-0001Aq-6z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:17:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZxgp-0001Aa-3x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:17:55 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HZxdH-0005Sb-Ax for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:14:15 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Virtual braille device support? Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:14:09 +0100 References: <20070406225614.GI23682@interface.famille.thibault.fr> In-Reply-To: <20070406225614.GI23682@interface.famille.thibault.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704070014.11214.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Samuel Thibault > The question I'd have for now is: how to choose which brand of USB > braille device to emulate? Should the simplest, fastest, or most > powerful protocol be chosen? I'd go for whichever is best documented and supported by the widest range of (Open Source) operating systems. Paul