From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HaGMI-00031E-Gb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:13:58 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HaGMG-0002vE-Km
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:13:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaGMG-0002ug-Ee
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:13:56 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1HaGIc-0006rJ-UY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:10:11 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Makefile.target vl.h hw/acpi.c hw/adlib.c ...
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:10:04 +0100
References: <E1HaFQv-0001jN-Uh@cvs> <1175970741.1516.5.camel@rapid>
In-Reply-To: <1175970741.1516.5.camel@rapid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704072010.05798.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>

On Saturday 07 April 2007 19:32, J. Mayer wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 18:14 +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > CVSROOT:	/sources/qemu
> > Module name:	qemu
> > Changes by:	Paul Brook <pbrook>	07/04/07 18:14:41
>
> The patches in the PowerPC target seem complete nonsense.

Can you give specific examples?
The CHRP code looks a bit broken, but no more so than before I started.

> Furthermore, this kind of patch that break other guys work would likely
> to be discussed and not beeing imposed.

It's been mentioned several times on this list (by Fabrice, specifically) that 
this is the way to go.

I applied this now specifically because there are big ARM patches waiting to 
be applied, and wanted to get this cleanup done before they went in.

Paul