From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HagCP-0008EV-NT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:49:29 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HagCO-0008Dt-52
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:49:29 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HagCN-0008Dl-UF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:49:27 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1Hag8c-0002Yz-EJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:45:34 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Makefile.target vl.h hw/acpi.c hw/adlib.c ...
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 23:45:27 +0100
References: <E1HaFQv-0001jN-Uh@cvs> <200704072145.27203.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4618288B.5060201@bellard.org>
In-Reply-To: <4618288B.5060201@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704082345.28184.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> 2) I don't like hiding pointers in types, so I would use for example
> 'QEMUSignal *' instead of 'qemu_irq'.

FWIW I did it this way so that devices are agnostic about whether it was 
implemented as a pointer or an integer index.

Paul