From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HbE8Q-0003uF-Ho
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:03:38 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HbE8O-0003sF-PF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:03:37 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HbE8O-0003rt-Cf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:03:36 -0400
Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1HbE4S-0002dr-FI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:59:32 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:59:22 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] use socklen_t with getsockopt()
Message-ID: <20070410105922.GC2235@mail.shareable.org>
References: <343495.72027.qm@web25708.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
	<20070405104220.GA27936@mail.shareable.org>
	<200704061751.28458.vapier@gentoo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200704061751.28458.vapier@gentoo.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: Sylvain Petreolle <spetreolle@users.sourceforge.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> > > Was incorrect before too, since it was sizeof(int) in the first place ?
> >
> > The old type of "val" was "int", so it made no different to the size.
> > When "val" is of type socklen_t, it matters.
> 
> val is still of type int which is fine ... socklen_t is for the variable which 
> describes the length of val

Yes, thanks for pointing it out.

-- Jamie