From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hd33K-0006I8-EK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:37:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hd33I-0006Ew-Lk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:37:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hd33I-0006EM-Fs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:37:52 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hd2yn-0000SN-Bq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:33:13 -0400 Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070415113329.NZBP4739.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:33:29 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.21.212]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20070415113319.KKSP17393.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:33:19 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Hd2yj-000625-GY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:33:09 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:33:09 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Message-ID: <20070415113309.GA23160@miranda.arrow> References: <4621F9B8.8090808@bandsman.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4621F9B8.8090808@bandsman.co.uk> Subject: [Qemu-devel] 16-bit (and 8-bit) emulation Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > Can qemu emulate 16-bit machines (286?)? None that I'm aware of. Is there any particular need for 286 emulation? OTOH, it might be interesting to see some m68k system emulation. I've been working on an 8-bit machine, with some success. The one thing that I'm not really sure about is bank switching (although I think I can just call cpu_register_physical_memory()). HTH, -- Stuart Brady