From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HdBUN-0006OY-Al
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:38:23 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HdBUL-0006OI-0C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:38:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HdBUK-0006OE-PG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:38:20 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1HdBPn-0004Yq-24
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:33:39 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch] Makefile.target
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:33:33 +0100
References: <46222F54.3080702@weilnetz.de>
	<200704151504.29308.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<46223EA0.30104@mail.berlios.de>
In-Reply-To: <46223EA0.30104@mail.berlios.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704152133.34580.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> But nevertheless, sometimes it happens that I "do that",
> and then I'm always happy when I get a clear error
> message. Or even better, when something works as
> expected even when I did something unexpected.
> You are lucky if you never experienced such situations.
>
> In my case, even a simple line like
> $(DYNGEN):
> in Makefile.target would have made me happier.

I still think you're poking around in things that shouldn't concern you, so 
deserve everything you get.

> "make subdir-i386-softmmu" is ok for my application,
> configuring with --target-list=i386-softmmu is no solution though
> because I need mips-softmmu and mipsel-softmmu, too :-)

So configure with --target-list=i386-softmmu,mips-softmmu,mipsel-softmmu

Paul