From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hdx4l-0001jP-VS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:27:08 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hdx4j-0001jD-La
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:27:06 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hdx4j-0001jA-F1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:27:05 -0400
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1Hdwzw-00041v-UD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:22:09 -0400
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:22:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.9.0 Win32 Tap inferface PPC Guest issue
Message-ID: <20070417232240.GB5096@networkno.de>
References: <OFD22E5C66.7F59ED04-ON852572B8.00613B04-852572B8.00621A74@orbital.com>
	<OF06417C40.5016D444-ON852572B8.006A8353-852572B8.006C4E6F@orbital.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF06417C40.5016D444-ON852572B8.006A8353-852572B8.006C4E6F@orbital.com>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Ely Soto <Soto.Ely@orbital.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Ely Soto wrote:
> Ok this is the fix I came up with.
> 
> Basically it will check all the other objects that could potentially be 
> waiting for service. This will prevent one high priority object from 
> starving the rest.
> 
> I'm not certain what the intention for the timeout > 0 check but this 
> completely prevented any wait object servicing on my machine.
> 
> The Tap interface now works smoothly without issue.

Please resend the version for current CVS as unified diff (diff -u)
without breaking the line formatting (an attachment should do).


Thiemo