From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HibO2-0004aD-Uh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:18:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HibO2-0004a0-Lo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:18:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HibO2-0004Zx-C9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:18:14 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1HibHo-00079I-BX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:11:48 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fixing ACPI for Vista -- Source code for bios.bin
	vs. bochs CVS?
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:11:44 +0100
References: <8FFF7E42E93CC646B632AB40643802A80282EDB7@scsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <8FFF7E42E93CC646B632AB40643802A80282EDB7@scsmsx412.amr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704302011.45291.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>

On Monday 30 April 2007, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> We found a way to get 32-bit Vista up on KVM by fixing bios.bin. And I
> think it should be helpful to qemu as well. However, I'm not sure if the
> binary file has been created simply by applying bios.diff to the latest
> bochs CVS tree (actually I doubt it).

What makes you think this won't work? Have you tried it?

Paul