From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjLIu-0000Ro-Mm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:20:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjLIu-0000Qg-2M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:20:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjLIt-0000QU-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:19:59 -0400 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjLCR-00038D-UM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 16:13:20 -0400 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Patch for SDL framebuffer console problem Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:12:56 -0400 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705021613.07542.rob@landley.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kitambi Leo On Tuesday 24 April 2007 2:23 am, Kitambi Leo wrote: > I've been using qemu using the Linux framebuffer console, on a machine > that's a bit too slow to support X. There have been more than a few snags, > but perhaps the most irritating one was that if qemu crashed (and received a > SIGSEGV), it would leave the console in an unusable state. This would > require me to log into the machine via ssh and reboot it remotely. Type "reset" and hit enter when this happens. Rob