From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HlvFp-0003zY-PW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 19:07:29 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HlvFo-0003x1-51
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 19:07:29 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlvFn-0003wp-UN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 19:07:28 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1Hlv8Y-0006j2-8C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2007 18:59:58 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Could any body fix the bug in gdbstub.c for x86_64?
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 23:59:48 +0100
References: <1fa17f810705090611o3355056hd9782dcca3f89ef8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fa17f810705090611o3355056hd9782dcca3f89ef8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200705092359.50136.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: MingyanGuo <guomingyan@gmail.com>

On Wednesday 09 May 2007, MingyanGuo wrote:
> Hi,
> The -s option for qemu-system-x86_64 is not useable.
> I've already post a patch, but it is ignored.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-05/msg00062.html

Please read the list archives for previous patches/discussions on this topic. 
Your patch is wrong in several ways

Paul