From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hploi-0004bA-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 09:51:24 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hplof-0004WO-Pz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 09:51:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hplof-0004WG-M4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 09:51:21 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hplof-0004mZ-6E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 09:51:21 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] emulated lance device crashes in debian-sparc32 Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:51:15 +0100 References: <20070519071656.74105a87@chirp> <200705201125.26929.paul@codesourcery.com> <20070520061502.2e76772f@chirp> In-Reply-To: <20070520061502.2e76772f@chirp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705201451.16532.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Blue Swirl , Mark Glines > So the issue on sparc was that the device is relied on by the > SS-5 platform code (it sounds like sun4m has this device on-board at > a fixed offset, non-pci), but not initialized properly due to the lack > of -net nic? Should sun4m imply -net nic,model=lance then? It doesn't > make much sense to me to ever turn the lance port off, if its > integrated into the platform itself (not a daughter card). It looks like it should be fairly easy to make sun4m-without-lance work. While this might not be a particularly useful/realistic combination, I think it's worth having consistent -net bahavior. Paul