From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HuqAb-0008MK-QP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:30:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HuqAZ-0008IX-U1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:30:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HuqAZ-0008IU-On
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:30:55 -0400
Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1HuqAZ-0007Ig-DJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:30:55 -0400
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:30:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu on mips patch
Message-ID: <20070603133051.GA13602@networkno.de>
References: <ab4614040706012337h19dbd6fr5bad1abf4485aac9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ab4614040706012337h19dbd6fr5bad1abf4485aac9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jun Peng <jun7903cn@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Jun Peng wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Are you are just testing host_mips qemu? I have been doing the same
> work two or three month
> 
> ago on a mips + linux system. But, it have some bugs however.
> 
> It is for qemu 0.6.1 refer to qemu-irix.patch at first. And yesterday,
> I made a qemu 0.9.0
>
> patch. It seems working(only target-i386). In order to handle
> relocation symbol, I writed a
> 
> little tool named op_mips.c. This tool is the key of my patch.

In the meanwhile the latest CVS qemu has preliminary mips host support,
could you refresh you patch to the latest version? I think the current
CVS version does the right thing without relying on on an equivalent
to your op_mips.c tool.

Also, a patch for the errno handling on mips went just in, please
write your version for x86 in the same style, and split it out in a
separate patch.


Thiemo