From: amateur <tianlei.zhao@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] CPUTLBEntry Question
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:41:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070614134136.GA6825@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <812074ac0706131325t578dfd5eiaa5836b160a24679@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:25:07PM -0400, Ryan Riley wrote:
> typedef struct CPUTLBEntry {
> /* bit 31 to TARGET_PAGE_BITS : virtual address
> bit TARGET_PAGE_BITS-1..IO_MEM_SHIFT : if non zero, memory io
> zone number
> bit 3 : indicates that the entry is invalid
> bit 2..0 : zero
> */
> target_ulong addr_read;
> target_ulong addr_write;
> target_ulong addr_code;
> /* addend to virtual address to get physical address */
> target_phys_addr_t addend;
> } CPUTLBEntry;
>
> If I change it to add another member, like so..
>
> typedef struct CPUTLBEntry {
> /* New member */
> target_phys_addr_t blah;
> } CPUTLBEntry;
>
> then QEMU crashes on startup. (It also crashes if I put that blah
> entry on the beginning instead of the end.) I'm sure there's code
> somewhere that must be making assumptions about the size of TLB entry,
> but I'm at a loss for finding it. (I have noticed that the assembly
> code in softmmu_header.h indexes to the addend based on addr_read or
> addr_write, but adding a new member to the end of the structure
> shouldn't impact that, right?)
-------------------------
The softmmu_header.h code does assume each TLB entry has a fixed size
of (2^CPU_TLB_ENTRY_BITS) bytes. Not only the assembly code, but also
the C code assume this. So if you want to add new members into
CPUTLBEntry, add the new member at the end of the data structure, and
adjust CPU_TLB_ENTRY_BITS accordingly.
Best Regards
Tianlei Zhao
--
Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-14 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-13 20:25 [Qemu-devel] CPUTLBEntry Question Ryan Riley
2007-06-14 13:22 ` Paul Brook
2007-06-14 19:31 ` Ryan Riley
2007-06-14 13:41 ` amateur [this message]
2007-06-14 14:00 ` Blue Swirl
2007-06-15 1:47 ` amateur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070614134136.GA6825@163.com \
--to=tianlei.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).