From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I0Hy0-000744-7v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:12:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I0Hxy-00073b-5N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:12:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0Hxy-00073Y-2p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:12:26 -0400
Received: from ftp.linux-mips.org ([194.74.144.162])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ralf@linux-mips.org>) id 1I0Hxx-0005Jy-JZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:12:25 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:24290 "EHLO
	dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id S20023248AbXFROMR (ORCPT <rfc822;qemu-devel@nongnu.org>);
	Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:12:17 +0100
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:02:41 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Message-ID: <20070618140241.GA757@linux-mips.org>
References: <20070616204834.GA610@farad.aurel32.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0706171005470.4497@anakin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706171005470.4497@anakin>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: 2.6.21 kernel on emulated/real Malta board
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:06:55AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> I guess it's just the printk buffer that's being output again to the new
> console, when the console subsystem switches from early console to real
> console.

Correct.

  Ralf