From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I31pD-0006rW-3R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:34:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I31pB-0006po-VP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:34:42 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I31pB-0006pR-Qj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:34:41 -0400
Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]
	helo=grelber.thyrsus.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rob@landley.net>) id 1I31pB-0000ih-F4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:34:41 -0400
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:34:26 -0400
References: <1182690837.14203.1196763767@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<200706241422.19597.rob@landley.net>
	<1182782247.25793.1196925235@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1182782247.25793.1196925235@webmail.messagingengine.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200706252334.28182.rob@landley.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU: "qemu -M pc" works, "qemu-i386" crashes.
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Cc: Qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Monday 25 June 2007 10:37:27 Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> --- linux-user/main.c   (r=C3=A9vision 527)
> +++ linux-user/main.c   (copie de travail)
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
>
>  /* for recent libc, we add these dummy symbols which are not declared
>     when generating a linked object (bug in ld ?) */
> -#if (__GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ =3D=3D 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >=3D 3)) =
&&
> !defined(CONFIG_STATIC)
> +#if (__GLIBC__ =3D=3D 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ =3D=3D 3) && !defined(CONFI=
G_STATIC)
>  long __preinit_array_start[0];
>  long __preinit_array_end[0];
>  long __init_array_start[0];

Nope, I still get an immediate segfault on the snapshot from the 23rd.

Rob
--=20
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.