From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I536S-0003Fa-D1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:20:52 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I536Q-0003FO-TN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:20:51 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I536Q-0003FL-Nv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:20:50 -0400
Received: from cpe-24-31-250-242.kc.res.rr.com ([24.31.250.242]
	helo=hachi.dashjr.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1I536Q-0002zC-DD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:20:50 -0400
Received: from [2002:1891:f663:0:20e:a6ff:fec4:4e5d] (unknown
	[IPv6:2002:1891:f663:0:20e:a6ff:fec4:4e5d])
	by hachi.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E7C960051
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun,  1 Jul 2007 17:20:46 +0000 (UTC)
From: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Porting QEMU to PalmOS
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:20:44 -0500
References: <748971.45217.qm@web54607.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	<fb249edb0707010529n759dd181s47270bd1770f5d44@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb249edb0707010529n759dd181s47270bd1770f5d44@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200707011220.45306.luke@dashjr.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sunday 01 July 2007 07:29, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 5/24/07, sinisa marovic <sinisamarovic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I'm afraid I will have to dissapoint you: it will be only isapc with no
> > networking or other fancy devices. Main goal is the ability to run dos
> > games. I do not know how familiar are you with PalmOS developer support.
> > It is poor, gcc lack many important functions that have to be written
> > from scratch. When I ported dosbox (which is written in c++)
>
> (Happily violating the GPL)
>
> Will the qemu port also be binary only?

What did he say that violates the GPL? Just because he is only porting the 
isapc stuff? I don't know any part of the GPL saying "when you port this, you 
must port all the features"... Or would such a port be inherently a violation 
due to system libraries being incompatible with the [L]GPL?