From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IDVHb-0000Ws-BI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:03:19 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IDVHZ-0000Vt-AK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:03:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDVHZ-0000Vl-5C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:03:17 -0400
Received: from smtp.ocgnet.org ([64.20.243.3])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lethal@linux-sh.org>) id 1IDVHY-0007dU-IN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:03:16 -0400
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:02:46 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] sh4: more patches
Message-ID: <20070725010246.GA13302@linux-sh.org>
References: <aec7e5c30706220044u5b4ae7felc64ed595454ebb37@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070622114819.GD25967@networkno.de>
	<aec7e5c30706242342s6f31937ft5900980ab2e21edd@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070625120153.GB24018@networkno.de>
	<aec7e5c30707032119t3d080394raea644a1a1b6a70a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aec7e5c30707032119t3d080394raea644a1a1b6a70a@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 01:19:07PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> wrote:
> >Can you also provide a regression test like some of the other targets
> >have? It would be very useful to detect breakage.
> 
> Sure, what about the attached hello-sh4 test patch?
> 
> And while at it I've attached two minor patches for fixing trapa
> single stepping and enabling of sh4-linux-user in ./configure.
> 
These don't seem to have been applied yet, is there something holding
these up?