From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IEU2P-0002Yv-S6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:55:41 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IEU2O-0002YJ-BD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:55:41 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEU2O-0002YD-5Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:55:40 -0400
Received: from hansmi.home.forkbomb.ch ([213.144.146.165])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <qemu@hansmi.ch>) id 1IEU2N-0003eI-8x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:55:39 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:55:31 +0200
From: Michael Hanselmann <qemu@hansmi.ch>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] What is the best way to control qemu on a remote box?
Message-ID: <20070727175531.GD22232@hansmi.ch>
References: <811169.10529.qm@web54105.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <811169.10529.qm@web54105.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:22:08AM -0700, n schembr wrote:
> Is system_powerdown a better way to stop the host?  Is
> system_powerdown a soft operation like the atx powersupply?  It did
> not work with  a smoothwall guest.

It would, but is not implemented for x86. I've been working on it using
ACPI, but gave up after an enquiry about IRQ handling on this list
hasn't been answered and a related patch has been ignored.

Greets,
Michael

--=20
http://hansmi.ch/

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFGqjGT6J0saEpRu+oRAs3LAJQJzRiqIB2B0u/qsNe7w3iEdiNQAJ4/eJnD
a07DzDCZesdpS4P6dzpVHw==
=QWFc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--