qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] make qemu work with GCC 4
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:28:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070830202811.GA11732@networkno.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708282124590.23011@wotan.suse.de>

Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [please keep me CCed, I'm not on this list]
> 
> the below patch let's qemu be compiled by GCC 4.2 (probably also 4.1 and 
> others) for most hosts (i386,x86_64,ia64,ppc).  s390 as host is missing, 
> and needs a compiler change to emit the literal store inline again, as the 
> literal pool at the end fundamentally breaks the assumption that qemu can 
> paste together the code snippets by patching out the return.  I have no 
> HOST_{ARM,MIPS*,ALPHA,SPARC*,M68K} machines to compile for that.
> 
> It specifically changes these things:
> 
> * ppc: adds -fno-section-anchors to OP_CFLAGS, as dyngen isn't prepared
>        to deal with the relocs resulting from using section anchors

Maybe this should be handled more generally then, not ppc specific, like
other "offending" compiler options: check if the compiler knows the
option, if yes, disable the feature.

> * ppc: on target-alpha op_reset_FT GCC4 uses a floating point constant 0.0
>        to reset the ft regs, which in turn is loaded from the data 
>        section.  The reloc for that is unhandled.  Using -ffast-math would 
>        work around this, but I chose to be conservative and change only
>        the op.c snippet in question.  See the comment there.
> * i386: well, most of you will know that GCC4 doesn't compile qemu because 
>        of reload.  The inherent problem is, that qemu uses 64bit
>        entities in some places (sometimes structs), which GCC (4.x) 
>        manages to place in registers, i.e. needs 2 hardregs.  But it 
>        sometimes just so happens that an instruction needing such DImode
>        reg also has a memory operand with an indexed address (reg plus 
>        reg), hence two hardregs more.  But qemu by default leaves just 
>        three free registers for compiling op.c --> boom.  This is somewhat 
>        hard to work around in GCC (trust me :) ).
> 
>        I solved that by placing one of the T[012] operands into memory
>        for HOST_I386, thereby freeing one reg.  Here's some justification 
>        of why that doesn't really cost performance: with three free regs
>        GCC is already spilling like mad in the snippets, we just trade one
>        of those memory accesses (to stack) with one other mem access to 
>        the cpu_state structure, which will be in cache.

Could you back up this assumption with some numbers? :-)
If there is a significant difference I recommend to make that workaround
conditional on GCC4 as well as HOST_I386.

[snip]
> diff -urp qemu-0.9.0.cvs.orig/target-arm/cpu.h qemu-0.9.0.cvs/target-arm/cpu.h
> --- qemu-0.9.0.cvs.orig/target-arm/cpu.h	2007-06-24 14:09:48.000000000 +0200
> +++ qemu-0.9.0.cvs/target-arm/cpu.h	2007-08-21 21:38:36.000000000 +0200
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ typedef uint32_t ARMReadCPFunc(void *opa
>   */
>  
>  typedef struct CPUARMState {
> +#if defined(HOST_I386)
> +    uint32_t t1;
> +#endif
>      /* Regs for current mode.  */
>      uint32_t regs[16];
>      /* Frequently accessed CPSR bits are stored separately for efficiently.
> diff -urp qemu-0.9.0.cvs.orig/target-arm/exec.h qemu-0.9.0.cvs/target-arm/exec.h
> --- qemu-0.9.0.cvs.orig/target-arm/exec.h	2007-06-03 19:44:36.000000000 +0200
> +++ qemu-0.9.0.cvs/target-arm/exec.h	2007-08-21 21:48:48.000000000 +0200
> @@ -23,7 +23,12 @@
>  register struct CPUARMState *env asm(AREG0);
>  register uint32_t T0 asm(AREG1);
>  register uint32_t T1 asm(AREG2);
> +#ifndef HOST_I386
>  register uint32_t T2 asm(AREG3);
> +#else
> +#define T2 (env->t1)
> +#endif

T2/t1 mismatch, it seems. Likewise for mips and ppc.


Thiemo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-30 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-28 19:57 [Qemu-devel] [patch] make qemu work with GCC 4 Michael Matz
2007-08-29  8:41 ` Andreas Färber
2007-08-29 11:40   ` Michael Matz
2007-08-29 13:14     ` Andreas Färber
2007-08-29 13:30       ` Michael Matz
2007-08-29 13:59         ` Mulyadi Santosa
2007-08-29 14:11           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-29 16:40             ` Michael Matz
2007-08-29 16:55               ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-29 18:09                 ` Blue Swirl
2007-08-30 12:46         ` Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
2007-08-29 13:59       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-29 14:13         ` Ronald
2007-08-29 14:19           ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-29 14:38             ` Andreas Färber
2007-08-29 14:27         ` Andreas Färber
2007-08-29 11:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-29 11:46   ` Michael Matz
2007-08-29 12:40     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-08-29 15:06 ` Paul Brook
2007-08-29 17:29   ` Michael Matz
2007-08-30 16:52     ` Michael Matz
2007-08-29 18:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-08-30 20:28 ` Thiemo Seufer [this message]
2007-08-31 13:31   ` Michael Matz
2007-08-31 14:17     ` Thiemo Seufer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070830202811.GA11732@networkno.de \
    --to=ths@networkno.de \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).