From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRTw7-0001Vs-5C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:26:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRTw5-0001VS-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:26:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRTw5-0001VL-7x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:26:53 -0400 Received: from wsip-68-15-230-7.om.om.cox.net ([68.15.230.7] helo=hachi.dashjr.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRTw4-00008Y-VU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:26:53 -0400 Received: from [2002:48ce:72ec:0:20d:60ff:fe77:7d85] (yokochan.lan [IPv6:2002:48ce:72ec:0:20d:60ff:fe77:7d85]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by hachi.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B99960D38 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 14:26:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Luke -Jr Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] Allowing QEMU to directly execute a directory (and storing command line options in it) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:26:48 -0500 References: <59abf66e0708311119p2b83fcffg31fac1c298cfc10a@mail.gmail.com> <1188586457.8543.2.camel@squirrel> <7CB48D77-249D-4DD9-83B8-D3DB8553C058@jump-ing.de> In-Reply-To: <7CB48D77-249D-4DD9-83B8-D3DB8553C058@jump-ing.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709010926.48797.luke@dashjr.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Saturday 01 September 2007, Markus Hitter wrote: > > qemu -c MyImage/vm.cfg > > In opposite to "qemu -c MyImage" ? > > Why do you want the user to do extra typing? There's one config in > one directory, so typing the config file name is just redundant. Why would there only be one config in one directory?