From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ico95-0004wC-TQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:15:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ico93-0004ug-Ds
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:15:07 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ico93-0004ua-6i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:15:05 -0400
Received: from warsl404pip8.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.102]
	helo=email.aon.at) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>) id 1Ico92-0006oI-O5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:15:05 -0400
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:15:03 +0200
From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: merge GGI support? [was: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] CRIS target port]
Message-ID: <20071002201503.GC20951@aon.at>
References: <20071002105745.GB4845@edgar.underground.se.axis.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021258510.28395@racer.site>
	<20071002164226.GB13534@aon.at>
	<20071002183647.GK16772@networkno.de>
	<20071002192951.GB20951@aon.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071002192951.GB20951@aon.at>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@axis.com>

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:29:51PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:36:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:

>>- What is the deal with the GGI license mentioned?
>
>I don't really know. The current patch has
>+/* #include license.bsd */
>But if this imposes a problem due to the advertising clause, it's fine
>with me to dual-license it BSD/GPL (or just GPL for that matter).

I just looked again and there is no issue that i can see.
QEMU as a whole is licensed under GPL, libqemu may be LGPL.
Several parts of devices are under BSD (if used standalone, outside
qemu, it seems).

I've expanded the brief '#include license.bsd' by the whole blob with a
note that

 * alternatively
 * you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 */

now, so that shouldn't be a real issue, i hope.