From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcoNv-00064T-6n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:30:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IcoNt-00062c-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:30:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcoNt-00062Q-9q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:30:25 -0400 Received: from warsl404pip8.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.102] helo=email.aon.at) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IcoNs-0001Od-Op for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:30:25 -0400 Received: from m984p029.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO s37.loc) ([62.47.154.253]) (envelope-sender ) by smarthub94.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Oct 2007 20:30:23 -0000 Received: from cow by s37.loc with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IcoNr-000867-HA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:30:23 +0200 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:30:23 +0200 From: Bernhard Fischer Subject: Re: merge GGI support? [was: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] CRIS target port] Message-ID: <20071002203023.GD20951@aon.at> References: <20071002105745.GB4845@edgar.underground.se.axis.com> <20071002164226.GB13534@aon.at> <470291D3.8020805@codemonkey.ws> <20071002192133.GA20951@aon.at> <4702A585.9070906@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4702A585.9070906@codemonkey.ws> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:09:41PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:45:39PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> What does one gain with GGI support? I've never seen a good answer to >>> this. >>> >> >> GGI supports a number of display-targets: >> http://www.ggi-project.org/targets.html >> umong them X11, quartz, directx, fbdev, vgl, vnc, wsfb, libaa, >> terminfo, cocoa, etc. >> > > SDL has a GGI backend. So you can already use GGI with QEMU. > > So, what does it buy to have QEMU use GGI directly? Well, I don't have SDL. What did it buy to add VNC support and cocoa support when there was already GGI support and GGI has backends for VNC and cocoa? ;) It's not that this patch removes SDL, VNC or cocoa support, really.