From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdTPz-0001a4-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:19:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdTPw-0001XY-Hh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:19:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IdTPw-0001XT-Cm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:19:16 -0400 Received: from nan.false.org ([208.75.86.248]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdTPw-00061x-6C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:19:16 -0400 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65571981F1 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:19:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CB4980A5 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:19:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IdTPt-0003QU-HG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:19:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:19:13 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU/MIPS & dyntick kernel Message-ID: <20071004161913.GA13110@caradoc.them.org> References: <20071002200644.GA19140@hall.aurel32.net> <1191463182.31950.32.camel@rapid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1191463182.31950.32.camel@rapid> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 03:59:42AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote: > > As announced by Ralf Baechle, dyntick is now available on MIPS. I gave a > > try on QEMU/MIPS, and unfortunately it doesn't work correctly. Aurelien is talking about a kernel option... > I tried to disactivate dynticks, just commenting the entry in > alarm_timers structure. Since then, I can notice that the emulated ... and I think you're talking about a qemu option with the same name. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery