From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: fix run of 32 bits Linux executables on 64 bits targets
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:00:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071011160025.GF3379@networkno.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580710110847v612b83ccu969803ebb743b5d6@mail.gmail.com>
Blue Swirl wrote:
[snip]
> > >> I would think this feature will be limited to platforms which can handle
> > >> 32bit and 64bit binaries with a single personality.
> > >
> > > I am not sure it is a common case !
> > >
> > > However, I suggest to emulate a 32 bit user linux system with a 64 bit
> > > guest CPU running in 32 bit compatibily mode. It would be useful to test 64
> > > bit CPUs in 32 bit compatibility mode. The only required modification in
> > > linux user is to rename target_ulong so that it can have a different size
> > > of the CPU word default size.
> >
> > Doesn't work for MIPS64, since it doesn't quite have a compatibility mode
> > in the traditional sense. It needs to retain 64bit register width when
> > running N32 ABI binaries. (Thus the somewhat odd overrides I added for
> > the preliminary N32 support.)
>
> CPU registers (and storage for full width registers) would still be 64
> bits. The ABI uses of target_ulong need to be changed to, for example
> abi_ulong so that the size can be changed.
I see.
> Sparc64 does not have a compatibility mode either (except for address
> masking), it can run Sparc32 binaries because of the cleverly designed
> instruction set. Ops use full 64 bits of a register, but there are two
> sets of CPU flags, 32 and 64 bits.
For MIPS it's not even that much, sign-extension magic handles everything.
Thiemo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-10 7:42 [Qemu-devel] RFC: fix run of 32 bits Linux executables on 64 bits targets J. Mayer
2007-10-10 8:18 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-10 16:09 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-10 17:49 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-10 18:40 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-10 19:02 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-10 21:51 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-11 15:17 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-11 15:47 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-11 16:00 ` Thiemo Seufer [this message]
2007-10-11 19:26 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-11 22:00 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-12 16:21 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-12 18:42 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-12 19:37 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-12 20:24 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-10-10 16:01 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-10 18:42 ` J. Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071011160025.GF3379@networkno.de \
--to=ths@networkno.de \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).