From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:30:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710150330.55998.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192362267.9976.383.camel@rapid>
On Sunday 14 October 2007, J. Mayer wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the code fetch optimisation patch against
> current CVS.
> As a remainder, this patch avoid use of softmmu helpers to fetch the
> code in most case. A new target define TARGET_HAS_VLE_INSNS has been
> added which is used to handle the case of an instruction that span 2
> pages, when the target CPU uses a variable-length instructions encoding.
> For pure RISC, the code fetch is done using raw access routines.
> + unsigned long phys_pc;
> + unsigned long phys_pc_start;
These are ram offsets, not physical addresses. I recommend naming them as such
to avoid confusion.
> + opc = glue(glue(lds,SUFFIX),MEMSUFFIX)(virt_pc);
> + /* Avoid softmmu access on next load */
> + /* XXX: dont: phys PC is not correct anymore
> + * We could call get_phys_addr_code(env, pc); and remove the else
> + * condition, here.
> + */
> + //*start_pc = phys_pc;
The commented out code is completely bogus, please remove it. The comment is
also somewhat misleading/incorrect. The else would still be required for
accesses that span a page boundary.
The code itself looks ok, though I'd be surprised if it made a significant
difference. We're always going to hit the fast-path TLB lookup case anyway.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-14 11:44 [Qemu-devel] RFC: Code fetch optimisation J. Mayer
2007-10-15 2:30 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2007-10-15 12:09 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-15 16:01 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-15 16:19 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-15 21:30 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-15 22:42 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-16 20:27 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-16 22:00 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-16 23:38 ` J. Mayer
2007-10-17 0:43 ` Paul Brook
2007-10-16 22:26 ` Paul Brook
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-12 8:33 J. Mayer
2007-10-12 15:21 ` Blue Swirl
2007-10-12 18:24 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2007-10-12 18:36 ` Fabrice Bellard
2007-10-12 18:39 ` Fabrice Bellard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710150330.55998.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=l_indien@magic.fr \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).