From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhmhP-0004Zs-RA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:43:07 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhmhN-0004Za-9U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:43:06 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhmhN-0004ZW-4j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:43:05 -0400
Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <sdbrady@ntlworld.com>) id 1IhmhM-0003oF-Lq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:43:04 -0400
Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35])
	by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id
	<20071016134259.EOBY25022.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:42:59 +0100
Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.26.151])
	by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id
	<20071016134259.EXJS26699.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow>
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:42:59 +0100
Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <sdbrady@ntlworld.com>) id 1IhmhF-0008H0-50
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:42:57 +0100
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:42:56 +0100
From: Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Questions on "hidden" functions in QEMU source code
Message-ID: <20071016134256.GA31792@miranda.arrow>
References: <fdaac4d50710160128y14815bf1xc6f833cd428dc962@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fdaac4d50710160128y14815bf1xc6f833cd428dc962@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 05:28:24PM +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> For example, functions like compute_all_incb() and compute_c_incl() in
> target-i386/op.c are never defined anywhere.

compute_all_inc* are defined in ops_template.h:~171.  You'll notice that 
ops_template.h is included four times from op.c.

> Another question: micro-op are defined as OPPROTO, but OPPROTO is
> actually defined as empty in dyngen-exec.h
> 
> #define OPPROTO
> 
> So what is the point of using OPPROTO here? I am sure that there is a
> good reason to do that, but cannot figure it out.

Presumably so that attributes can be defined later if they're needed.

Cheers,
-- 
Stuart Brady