From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjEYC-0001TC-9R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:39:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjEYA-0001Rn-Pn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:39:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjEYA-0001Re-LC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:39:34 -0400 Received: from nan.false.org ([208.75.86.248]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjEYA-0005MP-Ai for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:39:34 -0400 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BEE982CA for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:39:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB88980DD for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:39:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IjEY6-0002f9-Pq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:39:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:39:30 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu alpha? Message-ID: <20071020133930.GA10211@caradoc.them.org> References: <4711DF16.1040307@linux-kernel.at> <1192356867.9976.376.camel@rapid> <200710191949.14806.rob@landley.net> <1192870572.16781.29.camel@rapid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1192870572.16781.29.camel@rapid> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 10:56:12AM +0200, J. Mayer wrote: > I guess my Alpha CPU and ABI knowledge is too restricted to find the > problem of most program crashing for now. It seems to me that the Unique > register is not initialized properly, but this is just a guess and I > have no idea of what's going wrong with this register and what should be > its value. Are you running recent Alpha binaries? I believe the unique register is used for the thread-local storage base address. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery