From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IjlSl-0006RW-OZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:11 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IjlSi-0006L9-Fm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:10 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjlSi-0006Kl-8Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:08 -0400
Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ths@networkno.de>) id 1IjlSh-0003Tu-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:07 -0400
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:47:42 +0100
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: avoid #ifdef for target cpu list - for x86, too.
Message-ID: <20071022004742.GL4544@networkno.de>
References: <1192141709.9976.241.camel@rapid>
	<20071012085431.GA13221@karma.qumranet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071012085431.GA13221@karma.qumranet.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dan Kenigsberg <danken@qumranet.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> This seems like a good excuse to send my suggested -cpu option for the
> x86 target. It is just like my previous "take 4", but fits to the newly
> unified cpu_list.

Leads to an instant segfault for the i386 usermode emulation.


Thiemo