From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrAbJ-0004G2-FK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:03:37 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrAbH-0004FX-MO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:03:36 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrAbH-0004FU-Ij for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:03:35 -0500 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IrAbH-0001bJ-26 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 06:03:35 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Splitting vl.h Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:03:26 +0000 References: <200711110422.24440.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711111103.28459.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Blue Swirl On Sunday 11 November 2007, Blue Swirl wrote: > On 11/11/07, Paul Brook wrote: > > The attached patch starts splitting vl.h up a bit. > > I understand Fabrice's concern about small files, but I think this is > the right direction. Ok, I'll try to keep them to a minimum. e.g. I can combine cdrom.h and scsi-disk.h > In ide.c and esp.c there are TARGET_ and target_ dependencies, how do > you plan to handle those? Currently I don't, they will still be build per-target. Longer term this is something a generic bus architecture should handle. Paul